What to do next?

1 12 2006

No, I’m not talking about what to do for the day ahead on the croft but asking what we can do to further cut our consumption of resources, reduce our amount of waste and cut our emissions.

The Other Half and I make a conscious effort to minimise and reduce our electricity useage, to not make unnecessary journeys, to reject buying consumer goods, to reduce, reuse and recycle what we do buy, to grow our own fruit and vegetables to reduce food miles and so on.

But where we start to falter is in taking the next step, where on our small scale you can see the problems in cutting back on a larger scale while still bringing other people along with you.


I’d like to move a couple of steps further along on our programme of reducing domestic consumption both to cut what we consume and also to show that it can be done without too great a loss of comfort and convenience.

But, the OH does prefer a somewhat greater level of comfort and convenience than I do - although she’s definitely a lot further along the path to worldly asceticism than many people.

I’ve suggested we make a number of changes that would not only have the effect of curbing our consumption, but would also cut our financial outgoing considerably.

The savings made could then be ploughed into providing our own power generation, making further reductions in consumption and cash outflow possible.

I’d like to start by selling one of the two cars. That’s a big step when you live in a rural area with limited public transport and longer distances to travel.

We’re fortunate in that Insch does have a railway station and that our travelling distances are less than they could be but it would still require a greater level of thought and coordination to plan our journeys.

One car is used primarily for getting the OH to work and for family journeys, while the other is used for the croft-related journeys (collecting feed, taking animals to slaughter, collecting animals, tools and timber, etc) and taking the Wee ‘Un to playgroup.

I’ve worked out that we can use a single car to cover all the croft journeys with a bit of organisation. The main problem is the abattoir runs and collection of the butchered carcases.

But, I can take the animals for slaughter very early and be back before the OH leaves for work.

Collecting the meat is more complicated but at this point could be accomplished if I take the OH to work, collect the meat on the way back and then pick her up again.

It would be a busy day with a fair amount of driving, but much less than two month’s worth of journeys in a second car. (And there is a further option that I will consider later.)

The real sticking point is the Wee ‘Un’s playgroup. He enjoys the socialising and has thrived since he started going, so taking him out is not an option.

I’ve walked him the two miles into Insch a number of times, but it takes a quite a lot of time. We walk in, he stays at playgroup, I walk home, I walk back to collect him and then we walk home.

Repeat that five times a weeks and I’m losing a lot of time that would be better spent around the croft. Walking in and out once or twice a week would be more feasible, but I decided to look for other solutions.

The obvious one is a bike with either a child seat or a trailer. This would be much faster than walking and I could carry more of a load.

Then I stumbled across another possibility - a tricycle and not one of the old-fashioned single front wheel, dual rear wheels types. Although some of the traditional trikes with an electric motor for assistance were initially tempting.

No, I found a modern Danish interpretation of the trike which puts the dual wheels at the front and the single wheel at the back.

The Kangaroo bike “is is a state-of-the-art, environmentally-friendly transport solution which carries up to two children in a front-facing cabin with a large luggage bay behind the seats.

“It can also be modified ‘in seconds’ to a one seat carriage for passengers with Special Needs up to 100kg (over 15 stone) and up to 150cm tall (about 5 foot 6 “)”.

The Kangaroo can carry a maximum load of 100kg in the cabin, has adjustable seats fitted with “three point” safety belts and, as I found out from the UK distributor, an electric motor for assistance on steep hills will soon be an option.

A trike like this would enable me to take the Wee ‘Un to playgroup, do the shopping in the local shop and cycle back home with him and the groceries on board. Windy days and heavy snow would be an issue, but missing a few days of playgroup here and there would not be an issue.

And why would I need an electric motor? I am reasonably fit after all.

The problem is that while the trip into Insch is straightforward, the road towards Huntly is fairly steep in places while the back road to our feed merchant is extremely steep.

I could make it up these hills on a mountain bike and, after doing it for a while, do it even with a child on the back. But cycling a trike up the hills with a child and 60kg of poultry feed aboard?

No, an electric motor would be a good investment and could be recharged from a solar panel or wind turbine.

So, step one would be to sell the least practical car (the Land Rover Discovery) for between £1,800 and £2,000, then buy something like a Kangaroo (£1744.99 including delivery but excluding lights and an electric motor).

This would save around £180-200 a month on diesel fuel, servicing, tax, insurance, and car tax while cutting our consumption of fossil fuels and reducing emissions. Of course, my consumption of oatmeal porridge would have to increase…

We could cut fuel use and costs still further, but I’ll keep this for the next post. I’ll also look at other areas where we could cut back on “conveniences” and “luxuries” but where the OH and the boys might disagree.

In the meantime, I’m open to more suggestions on the transportation side…


Actions

Information

10 responses to “What to do next?”

1 12 2006
welsh girls allotment (10:15:59) :

How did the original crofters get about ? Granted they probably didn’t to make as many journey’s as we do these days but would a horse and cart be a feasible idea , you have the cost of the horse and feed and vet bills to factor in. I think the main problem would be other road users, chelsea tractors and people driving to fast. Equally though that maybe a problem with the Kangaroo - just a thought from a townie !!

1 12 2006
stonehead (12:21:55) :

I have actually considered getting a horse, but have ruled it out in the immediate future for various reasons. I’ll be posting on this soon as a follow-up to this post and another couple I have in mind.
As for traffic, well, we walk in and out of town already so we’re used to it. The school janitor cycles past, a couple of old chaps walk out this way regularly from Insch, and you get the odd horse or hillwalker as well. We’ll make sure we’re well lit and wear high-visibility clothing.
Besides, if everyone said it wasn’t safe for non-motorists to use the roads, then we wouldn’t make any progress at all on cutting back!

1 12 2006
Mel (13:53:10) :

It looks great. I used to know someone who had a trike with 3 full-sized wheels instead of 1big 2small. Across the back axle was a baord with 2 child harnesses so she could cycle her kids around in safety. I liked the fact that the kids were elevated and so more visible to cars. I’ve seen little trailers you can attach to a normal bicycle and tow one child around, but I wouldn’t trust a driver to notice the trailer. And I never liked the child seat mounted on a bicycle because the child would be very vulnerable if the adult came off the bike. The trike has stability and visibility and looks like an excellent option.

1 12 2006
stonehead (17:47:45) :

I like the way the Kangaroo has the children in front where you can see them. I also like the way they’re in proper seats, with seat belts, in a rugged capsule with good weather protection.
One of the problems with carrying children on bikes is that because they’re not exerting themselves and are very exposed to the weather, they can get very cold.
We experienced this when we lived in Bicester and the OH cycled to work with him on the back for the nursery drop-off. He would get very cold even with many layers of clothes and windproof leggings and jacket.
I’ve considered a couple of other tricycles:
Christiana Bikes - apparently very trendy, but while they cost less than the Kangaroo you don’t get all the kit (even a hood costs extra).
Nihola - hard to find in the UK, cost is similar to the Christiana and you have to up the spec as well.
And here’s the opinion of a Kangaroo cyclist and of a Christiana cyclist.

1 12 2006
hedgewizard (21:24:20) :

Nice. There’s bound to be a second-hand market for these if you’re prepared to watch and wait - but how easy is it to get parts for them?

1 12 2006
stonehead (21:45:17) :

There are only a handful of Kangaroos in the UK at present, about 100 Christianas and I haven’t been able to find a Nihola.
As far as the Kangaroo is concerned, almost all the running parts are standard bicycle parts. It’s normally sent to a specialist cycle shop near the buyer, assembled there and then collected by the buyer who either rides it home or takes it away in a trailer.
Personally, I’d rather assemble it myself so I know how it all goes together.
As for watching and waiting, it all depends on how soon you want to make a difference.
Yes, a Kangaroo is around the same price as a tolerable used-car (about the same as our Discovery is worth) but with very few of the running costs - no fuel, no road tax, vastly less servicing, etc. I would take out cycle insurance though.
In fact, our Discovery is a couple of months past the time when we should have sold it (it took some work to get it through the MoT so it should have gone then), so we should be looking for a replacement anyway.

2 12 2006
rodger (10:50:46) :

The Christiana and Nihola are distributed in the UK by Velorution in London who are pretty knowledgeable about load bikes in general. [ http://www.velorution.biz ]. In addition to the Kangaroo [www.kangaroobike.com] there is also a German version called the Pedalpower KTR that I think is a bit less costly than the Kangaroo. [www.pedalpower.de - Follow the 'Lastenrader' link or risk the Google translation service!] You can also buy a basic chassis from them. On the two wheeled side is there is the Bakfiets from http://www.bakfiets.nl or in the UK Mike Burrows [no web - call 01603 721700] makes the ‘8-freight’. Two wheels can be more nimble but lose out for heavily laden climbing where the ability to gear down and wind up slowly without falling over is essential. I’ve been towing my ‘wee lad’ aged 4 in to playgroup in a trailer behind my commuting vehicle - a Greenspeed recumbent trike.

2 12 2006
rodger (10:51:48) :

BTW Anyone interested in practical [alternative???] cycling should have a look at http://www.velovision.co.uk.

2 12 2006
stonehead (11:19:00) :

Thanks for the extra information and links, Rodger. Much appreciated.
I have tried a load-carrying two-wheeler called a Long John, but I found it far too unstable when stationary. It wasn’t too bad on the move, but when you stopped at a junction with a load aboard it would get the wobbles when a large truck or bus blasted past.
I also had a go on a pedal rickshaw once - good gearing made it surprisingly easy to pedal even with two people sitting behind. But, that was on the flat!
Any chance of a pic of you on your recumbent with the child trailer in tow, please? I’d like to link to one or post one here to show what can be done.

4 12 2006
rodger (12:56:22) :

Sure! Drop me a note and I’ll send you a pic!

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>