<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The anti-consumer and socks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/</link>
	<description>The trials and tribulations of a modern crofter</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stonehead</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>stonehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>I posted earlier this year about &lt;a href="http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/fashion-with-a-conscience/" rel="nofollow"&gt;environmentally friendly fashion&lt;/a&gt; and included half a dozen links. I should have linked to the post earlier!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted earlier this year about <a href="http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/07/06/fashion-with-a-conscience/" rel="nofollow">environmentally friendly fashion</a> and included half a dozen links. I should have linked to the post earlier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 09:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-697</guid>
		<description>LOL Stonehead 

I meants SOCKS ooops!! Sack cloth undies maybe??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Stonehead </p>
<p>I meants SOCKS ooops!! Sack cloth undies maybe??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodgirlculture</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>goodgirlculture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-693</guid>
		<description>On the subject of secondhand undies, I am a little concerned about it...though I haven't had to cross that bridge yet as part of Subverting Overconsumption. 

However, shortly after starting the blog I got this great email from an uncle of mine on the excellent possibilities for discovering used underwear. I was about 50% amused and 50% disburbed. Here's an excerpt:

"So I hear you are going to buy nothing new for a whole year, what agreat idea. Sometimes I find new underwear at the sally-ann*, but I think they may have been a dead man's pair and he just never got to use them. Your mom said you were going to make up a blog on your year shoppig adventure, send it to me please."

*Sally-Ann is the Salvation Army Thrift Store...not sure if that's exclusively a Canadian or North American thing.

Anyway, I'm not sure which is worse: the prospect of buying underwear that somebody alive wore, or the prospect of buying underwear that somebody dead didn't get a chance to wear.

Stay tuned to see how I face this really weird dilemma in the coming months (subvertingoverconsumption.wordpress.com). Thanks Stonehead for sending so many nice folks my way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of secondhand undies, I am a little concerned about it&#8230;though I haven&#8217;t had to cross that bridge yet as part of Subverting Overconsumption. </p>
<p>However, shortly after starting the blog I got this great email from an uncle of mine on the excellent possibilities for discovering used underwear. I was about 50% amused and 50% disburbed. Here&#8217;s an excerpt:</p>
<p>&#8220;So I hear you are going to buy nothing new for a whole year, what agreat idea. Sometimes I find new underwear at the sally-ann*, but I think they may have been a dead man&#8217;s pair and he just never got to use them. Your mom said you were going to make up a blog on your year shoppig adventure, send it to me please.&#8221;</p>
<p>*Sally-Ann is the Salvation Army Thrift Store&#8230;not sure if that&#8217;s exclusively a Canadian or North American thing.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m not sure which is worse: the prospect of buying underwear that somebody alive wore, or the prospect of buying underwear that somebody dead didn&#8217;t get a chance to wear.</p>
<p>Stay tuned to see how I face this really weird dilemma in the coming months (subvertingoverconsumption.wordpress.com). Thanks Stonehead for sending so many nice folks my way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonehead</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>stonehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Hmm, not many moose in these har hills! How many rabbit skins to make one moose skin? :D

I've added the link to the frienship letter to your comment. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, not many moose in these har hills! How many rabbit skins to make one moose skin? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve added the link to the frienship letter to your comment. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonehead</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>stonehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-686</guid>
		<description>What? Knitted undies? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? Knitted undies? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>I love buying second hand clothes but no... sorry, I couldn't do the socks and undies :)

I guess you could always knit your own from a second hand jumper that doesn't fit .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love buying second hand clothes but no&#8230; sorry, I couldn&#8217;t do the socks and undies <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I guess you could always knit your own from a second hand jumper that doesn&#8217;t fit .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol in crathie</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>carol in crathie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Well, here is an alternative to socks....You make Canadian Indian style wrap ups!  No, not the tortilla stuffed kind you twink!  They are thin leather (moose hide is the best because you can wash it - dry flat, put on while slightly damp to form.)  Follow your basic, sans cuff, moccasin pattern, but the make an attachable ankle portion that has an extra wide front portion which wraps over.  The ties are threaded through the top of the moccasion portion and wrap up like ghillie brogues.  They last really well if cared for properly and double soled.  I had mine made in 1986.  Still wearing them and resoled twice when they started getting thin.

If you want a pattern, get in touch with the &lt;a href="http://www3.telus.net/public/slnfc1/index.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Slave Lake Alberta Native Friendship centre&lt;/a&gt;.  They should have a website and be happy to help you out.  Catherine Augier made mine....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here is an alternative to socks&#8230;.You make Canadian Indian style wrap ups!  No, not the tortilla stuffed kind you twink!  They are thin leather (moose hide is the best because you can wash it - dry flat, put on while slightly damp to form.)  Follow your basic, sans cuff, moccasin pattern, but the make an attachable ankle portion that has an extra wide front portion which wraps over.  The ties are threaded through the top of the moccasion portion and wrap up like ghillie brogues.  They last really well if cared for properly and double soled.  I had mine made in 1986.  Still wearing them and resoled twice when they started getting thin.</p>
<p>If you want a pattern, get in touch with the <a href="http://www3.telus.net/public/slnfc1/index.htm" rel="nofollow">Slave Lake Alberta Native Friendship centre</a>.  They should have a website and be happy to help you out.  Catherine Augier made mine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: welsh girls allotment</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>welsh girls allotment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Nearly all of my stuff is second hand but I will draw the line at knickers bras and socks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly all of my stuff is second hand but I will draw the line at knickers bras and socks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susie rigby</title>
		<link>http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>susie rigby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stonehead.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/the-anti-consumer-and-socks/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>I often buy second-hand because I love a bargain and now I can feel good about it too,because it's recycling! Yes!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often buy second-hand because I love a bargain and now I can feel good about it too,because it&#8217;s recycling! Yes!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
